Circular definitions, circular explanations, and infinite regresses

Argumentation 8 (3):295-308 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the ways in which circular definitions and circular explanations entail or fail to entail infinite regresses. And since not all infinite regresses are vicious, a few criteria of viciousness are examined in order to determine when the entailment of a regress refutes a circular definition or a circular explanation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-17

Downloads
109 (#195,479)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claude Gratton
University of Toronto (PhD)

References found in this work

Principles of mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1931 - New York,: W.W. Norton & Company.
Commonplace Book, 1919-1953.George Edward Moore (ed.) - 1962 - New York: Routledge.
Question-begging in non-cumulative systems.J. D. Mackenzie - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):117 - 133.
Petitio and the Purpose of Arguing.Frank Jackson - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (1):26-36.

View all 49 references / Add more references