Progress in First-Person Method: A Few Steps Forward, a Few Steps Back

Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):205-206 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A First-Person Analysis Using Third Person-Data as a Generative Method: A Case Study of Surprise in Depression” by Natalie Depraz, Maria Gyemant & Thomas Desmidt. Upshot: Supplementing physiological measures with first-person data involves several benefits and challenges. The collection and analysis of the two types of data might not be optimal within the same procedural framework. Therefore, the synthesis of the two remains problematic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supersizing Third-Person, Downsizing First-Person Approaches?S. Vörös - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):210-212.
First-Person Science is Third Person and Vice Versa.Chris Fields - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):240-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-23

Downloads
22 (#978,081)

6 months
4 (#1,260,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references