Why the histrionic personality disorder should not be in the DSM: A new taxonomic and moral analysis

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (1):26-40 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue for a reconsideration of the taxonomy of the Histrionic Personality Disorder. First, HPD does not carry the negative ethical implications of the other Cluster Bs, which are Anti-Social, Borderline, and Narcissistic. Using Aristotelian notions of character as a heuristic device, I argue that ontologically HPD is not a personality disorder, but instead a cultural disorder, a result of attitudes toward traditionally feminine styles of interaction. This explains the confusion in the research between HPD and hysteria and also the curious paucity of literature on HPD itself in contrast to the other Cluster Bs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-10

Downloads
112 (#192,324)

6 months
14 (#240,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carol Gould
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

The New Hysteria: Borderline Personality Disorder and Epistemic Injustice.Natalie Dorfman & Joel Michael Reynolds - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):162-181.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references