The place of historical statements in biology

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (31):192-210 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,326

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gould on laws in biological science.Lee Mcintyre - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):357-367.
Remembering Gould. [REVIEW]John S. Wilkins - 2007 - Metascience 16 (1):169-173.
Dawkins vs. Gould: Survival of the fittest.Matthew Elton - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):365-369.
K. Sterelny and P. E. Griffiths sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology.Todd A. Grantham - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):175-179.
Functional explanation in biology.Hugh Lehman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (1):1-20.
Memorium for Stephen Jay Gould.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):303-304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#678,880)

6 months
7 (#618,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What philosophy of biology is not.David L. Hull - 1969 - Synthese 20 (2):157 - 184.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references