The Self and the Ontic Trust: Toward Technologies of Care and Meaning

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3) (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose – Contemporary technology has been implicated in the rise of perfectionism, a personality trait that is associated with depression, suicide and other ills. is paper explores how technology can be developed to promote an alternative to perfectionism, which is a self- constructionist ethic. Design/methodology/approach – is paper takes the form of a philosophical discussion. A conceptual framework is developed by connecting the literature on perfectionism and personal meaning with discussions in information ethics on the self, the ontic trust and technologies of the self. To illustrate these themes, the example of selfies and self-portraits is discussed. Findings – e self today must be understood as both individualistic and relational, i.e., hybrid; the trouble is balance. To realize balance, the self should be recognized as part of the ontic trust to which all information organisms and objects belong. us technologically-mediated self-care takes on a deeper urgency. e selfie is one example of a technology for self-care that has gone astray (i.e., lost some of its care-conducive aspects), but this can be remedied if selfie-making technology incorporates relevant aspects of self-portraiture. is example provides a path for developing self- constructionist and meaningful technologies more generally. Practical implications – Technology development should proceed with self-care and meaning in mind. e comparison of selfies and self-portraits, situated historically and theoretically, provides some guidance in this regard. Some specific avenues for development are presented. Originality/value – e question of the self has not been much discussed in information ethics. is paper links the self to the ontic trust: the self can be fruitfully understood as an agent within the ontic trust to which we all belong.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Self(ie).Marija Selak - 2017 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 1 (1):61-66.
‘Technologies of the self and other’: how self-tracking technologies also shape the other.Katleen Gabriels & Mark Coeckelbergh - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (2):119-127.
Conceptualizing Self-Documentation.Tim Gorichanaz - forthcoming - Online Information Review 43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-23

Downloads
2,185 (#5,647)

6 months
146 (#31,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Gorichanaz
Drexel University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The informational nature of personal identity.Luciano Floridi - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (4):549-566.
What Is a Portrait?Hans R. V. Maes - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3):303-322.
Web 2.0 Technologies of the Self.Maria Bakardjieva & Georgia Gaden - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (3):399-413.

View all 6 references / Add more references