Nietzsche and Mechanism. On the Use of History for Science

In Helmut Heit & Lisa Heller (eds.), Handbuch Nietzsche und die Wissenschaften des 19. Jahrhunderts. Boston: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 119-137 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is devoted to a comparison between Ernst Mach's and Friedrich Nietzsche's anti-metaphysical approach to scientific and philosophical concepts. By making reference to Mach’s early essay on the conservation of energy (Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, 1872), I argue that Nietzsche shares with him the idea that the concepts we adopt are only useful fictions developed during the history of humankind and its culture. This idea is fundamental for the development of modern science, since Mach’s epistemology contributed to give up the mechanistic (Newtonian) view of physics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche and Mechanism.Pietro Gori - 2013 - In Helmut Heit & Lisa Heller (eds.), Handbuch Nietzsche und die Wissenschaften des 19. Jahrhunderts. Boston: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 119-137.
Nietzsche as Phenomenalist?Pietro Gori - 2011 - In Helmut Heit, Günter Abel & Marco Brusotti (eds.), Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Hintergründe, Wirkungen und Aktualität. de Gruyter. pp. 345-356.
The theory of knowledge of Mach and Nietzsche.Pietro Gori - 2011 - Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 7 (2):352-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-05

Downloads
996 (#20,963)

6 months
96 (#64,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pietro Gori
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

Nietzsche’s Posthuman Political Vision.Paul O’Mahoney - 2020 - The European Legacy 25 (1):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references