Assessing utilities

Mind 80 (320):531-541 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxx.320.531

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Goldstick and O’Neill on" Truer than".Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):491-495.
Response by Danny Goldstick.[author unknown] - 1995 - Nature, Society, and Thought 8 (2):160-164.
A reply to professor Goldstick.Bernard E. Rollin - 1974 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (4):595-597.
Judging the Importance of Religious Teachings: A Reply to Goldstick.David Pena - 2004 - Nature, Society, and Thought 17 (3):337-342.
Daniel Goldstick, Reason, Truth, and Reality. Reviewed by.Glen Melanson - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (4):266-268.
Review of Dan Goldstick, Reason, Truth, and Reality. [REVIEW]Peter Tramel - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (1).
A Quantitative Approach to Proportionality.Giovanni Sartor - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 613-636.
Elicitation and modelling of imprecise utility of health states.Michał Jakubczyk & Dominik Golicki - 2020 - Theory and Decision 88 (1):51-71.
Re-thinking the criminal standard of proof: Seeking consensus about the utilities of trial outcomes.Larry Laudan & Harry Saunders - unknown
Consensus and the ideal observer.Keith Lehrer - 1985 - Synthese 62 (1):109 - 120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#631,039)

6 months
12 (#304,424)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Goldstick
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made.Peter J. Hammond - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 200--254.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references