Human Flourishing, Human Nature, and Practices: MacIntyre’s Ethics Still Requires a More Thomistic Metaphysics

Filozofia 79 (3):319-333 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to investigate what enables human flourishing from a Thomistic perspective by considering Aquinas’ natural inclinations. I will argue that human beings flourish in different ways, depending on their practices. However, not every practice contributes to human flourishing, but only those that are consistent with human nature, which agents grasp through their natural inclinations. To support this argument, I will critically analyze MacIntyre’s account, referring mainly to his latest work (2016). MacIntyre has the merit of highlighting the role of practices in human flourishing by considering the narrative dimension in the agents’ lives, but he fails to recognize the properly metaphysical framework of human nature, that would be provided by the proper consideration of natural inclinations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond human flourishing: an argument for ecological education.Anders Schinkel - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy of Education.
Reid's Response to Hume's Moral Critique of Religion.Esther Engels Kroeker - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (1):85-100.
Thomas Aquinas on Natural Inclinations and the Practical Cognition of Human Goods.Justin Matchulat - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):239-271.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Impairment, Natural Goods, and Human Flourishing.John Berkman & Robyn Boeré - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (2):311-328.
Le inclinazioni naturali: un confine metafisico nel dibattito contemporaneo sulla legge naturale.Giulia Codognato - 2022 - In C. Daffonchio & I. Candelieri (eds.), Confini e sconfinamenti. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste. pp. 355-368.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-15

Downloads
60 (#356,937)

6 months
10 (#415,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giulia Codognato
Università degli Studi di Udine

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1957 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (3):242-247.

View all 14 references / Add more references