The Wrongfulness of Any Intent to Kill

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (2):221-248 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Germain Grisez’s philosophical argument for respecting human life has been developed by fellow new natural law theorists and applied to a range of lethal actions, for its conclusion is vast: intending the death of any human being as a means or an end is wrong in itself. For some Thomists, the NNL view on killing is both lax and rigorist: They consider it lax because its narrow criterion for what is “intended” leaves out some acts, especially ones related to abortion, that the critics consider murder. And they consider the NNL view rigorist insofar as it apparently rules out the death penalty, contrary to the Thomistic tradition and perhaps even heretically. However, the most salient philosophical arguments for exceptions to the principle against intending anyone’s death are weaker than the case for any given premise of the contrary NNL argument. Nevertheless, some NNL theorists’ arguments on life are unsound, some can be defended better than they have been, and some nonphilosophical objections based on theological authority require more exploration.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sexual Ethics, Practical Reason, and the Magisterium.Melissa Moschella - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1):99-127.
Artificial Nutrition and Hydration and Care at the End of Life.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2021 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 21 (3):453-482.
Magisterial Teaching on the Foundation of Sexual Ethics.Irene Alexander - 2021 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 21 (1):85-105.
The Perverted Faculty Argument Is Still Sound.John Skalko - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (4):689-710.
The Contralife Argument Revisted.Lawrence Masek - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (3):509-519.
On Some Proposals for Producing Human Stem Cells.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):257-264.
Abortion and Good Samaritan Arguments.Trent Horn - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (3):435-442.
Two Theories of Action and the Permissibility of Abortion.Elisabeth Parish - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (1):59-72.
Marriage, “Bodily Union,” and Natural Teleology.Joshua Madden - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (1):83-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-01

Downloads
42 (#546,184)

6 months
7 (#676,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sherif Girgis
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Baruch Brody and the principle of justifiable homicide.Timothy Furlan - 2024 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 45 (5):329-361.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references