Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):24-25 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The environment in which humans evolved is strongly and positively autocorrelated in space and time. Probabilistic judgments based on the assumption of independence may not yield evolutionarily adaptive behavior. A number of “faults” of human reasoning are not faulty under fuzzy arithmetic, a nonprobabilistic calculus of reasoning under uncertainty that may be closer to that underlying human decision making.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities.David M. Eddy - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 249--267.
The uncertain reasoner: Bayes, logic, and rationality.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):105-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
27 (#825,296)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations