Everything you did not necessarily want to know about gravitational waves. And why

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):268-282 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.008

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the “direct detection” of gravitational waves.Jamee Elder - 2025 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 110 (C):1-12.
Correspondence.[author unknown] - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):209-212.
Gingras and the rules regress.Harry Collins - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):113.
Response to one point in Gingras’s review of Gravity’s shadow.Harry Collins - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):151-153.
You want the social? You can’t handle the social! Mirowski on the secret history of scientific philosophy.D. Wade Hands - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):726-733.
What inquiring minds should want to know. [REVIEW]Sheila Jasanoff - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):149-157.
A syllabus of Gingras’ errors: Yves Gingras: Science and religion: an impossible dialogue. Maiden, MA: Polity Books, July 2017, 272p, $26.95 PB.Yiftach Fehige & Adam Richter - 2019 - Metascience 28 (2):211-219.
Faith reason and dialogue: Yves Gingras: Science and religion: an impossible dialogue. Maiden, MA: Polity Books, July 2017, 272 pp, $26.95 PB.Menachem Fisch - 2019 - Metascience 28 (2):229-235.
Yves Gingras, Science and Religion: An Impossible Dialogue. Cambridge: Polity Books, 2017. Pp. 249. ISBN 978-1-5095-1892-0. £17.99. [REVIEW]Renny Thomas - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Science 52 (2):363-364.
Did King Alfonso of Castile really want to advise God against the Ptolemaic system? The legend in history.Maarten Franssen - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):313-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
61 (#350,557)

6 months
8 (#594,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Response to Collins about 'one point' that is absent from my review of his book.Yves Gingras - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):112-.
Gingras and the rules regress.Harry Collins - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):113.
Response to one point in Gingras’s review of Gravity’s shadow.Harry Collins - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):151-153.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.Harry M. Collins - 1981 - Social Studies of Science 11:3-10.
How to avoid the experimenters' regress.Allan Franklin - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):463-491.
The philosophy of no.Gaston Bachelard - 1968 - New York,: Orion Press.
A Strong Confirmation Of The Experimenters' Regress.H. M. Collins - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):493-503.

View all 7 references / Add more references