Beyond Canterbury: Can Medicine and Law Agree about Informed Consent? And Does It Matter?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (1):106-111 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informed consent is central to the law of the physicianpatient relationship, respecting patient autonomy. This paper addresses a conflict between law and medicine in defining informed consent. Additionally, it addresses the possibility that patients prefer not to be “informed“ and would defer decision-making to their physicians.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed Consent as Societal Stewardship.Nadia N. Sawicki - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (1):41-50.
Getting the “Informed” into “Informed Consent,” and Proving It.David M. Studdert - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):975-977.
Cancer and the Law of Informed Consent.Sheila Taub - 1982 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 10 (2):61-66.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-21

Downloads
20 (#1,084,435)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why is conversation so easy?Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):8-11.
Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent.Oonagh Corrigan - 2003 - Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3):768-792.
Is consent in medicine a concept only of modern times?P. Dalla-Vorgia - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):59-61.

Add more references