We Are Not Replicable: A Challenge to Parfit’s View

International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (4):453-460 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Challenging the idea of personal identity, Derek Parfit has argued that persons are replicable and that personal identity does not really matter. In a recent paper Parfit again defends the idea of personal replicability. Challenging this idea in turn, I explain why persons are absolutely not replicable. To prove this I rely on two arguments—the Author Argument and the Love Argument. The irreplicability of persons relies upon the singularity of each person and thus entails that personal identity is irreducible and that it really does matter.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-09

Downloads
57 (#375,538)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amihud Gilead
University of Haifa

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references