Should Philosophers of Mathematics Make Use of Sociology?

Philosophia Mathematica 22 (1):12-34 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers whether philosophy of mathematics could benefit by the introduction of some sociology. It begins by considering Lakatos's arguments that philosophy of science should be kept free of any sociology. An attempt is made to criticize these arguments, and then a positive argument is given for introducing a sociological dimension into the philosophy of mathematics. This argument is illustrated by considering Brouwer's account of numbers as mental constructions. The paper concludes with a critical discussion of Azzouni's view that mathematics differs fundamentally from other social practices

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is dialectical philosophy of mathematics?Brendan Larvor - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):212-229.
Lakatos as historian of mathematics.Brendan P. Larvor - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (1):42-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-14

Downloads
183 (#132,730)

6 months
12 (#307,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Gillies
University College London

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.

View all 17 references / Add more references