Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism

Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):71-72 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf02628699

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism.Dr Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):71-72.
Why teach ethics in science and engineering?Rachelle D. Hollander, Deborah G. Johnson, Jonathan R. Beckwith & Betsy Fader - 1993 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):83-87.
Some remarks on scientific positivism and constructivist epistemology in science.Ashok K. Vijh - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):5-8.
Commentary.Professor Sheldon Krimsky - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):341-344.
Development of international guidelines for research ethics: A commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends".Matthias Kaiser - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):293-298.
The Limits of the Buddhist Embrace of Science: Commentary on “Compassion, Ethics, and Neuroscience: Neuroethics through Buddhist Eyes”.Francisca Cho - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):539-542.
Talking about science: Commentary on “The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science”.Sheila Jasanoff - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):525-528.
Commentary on “the social responsibilities of biological scientists” (s. J. Reiser and R. E. bulger).Jonathan Beckwith & Lisa N. Geller - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):145-148.
Commentary on “the social responsibilities of biological scientists” (s. J. Reiser and R. E. bulger).Aaron A. Salzberg - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):149-152.
Are scientific papers examples of rhetoric?: Commentary on “Rhetoric, technical writing, and ethics”.Frederick Grinnell - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):487-488.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#327,127)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Views on the NAS/NAE/IM convocation on scientific conduct.J. A. Casazza & Seymour J. Garte - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):111-112.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 6 references / Add more references