Paradox in Ontology: Black Holes, Cosmology, Wittgenstein versus Stephen Hawking’s Claim that Philosophy is Dead

In Jesús Padilla Gálvez (ed.), Ontological Commitment Revisited. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 139-152 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Hawking Information Loss Paradox: The Anatomy of a Controversy.Gordon Belot, John Earman & Laura Ruetsche - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):189-229.
Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, a Case for Practical Ontology?Jonathan Smith - 2021 - In Jesús Padilla Gálvez (ed.), Ontological Commitment Revisited. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 131-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-09

Downloads
13 (#1,332,544)

6 months
6 (#891,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arthur Gibson
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references