Narveson on Liberty and Equality

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):249-258 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At issue with Narveson is not the independence of persons, but an extreme form of ownership. Many people could be more independent with ownership of a moderate kind. All Narveson’s arguments depend on presupposing that extreme ownership has a special moral status.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0739098X

DOI

10.5840/ijap201125223

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Equal Negative Liberty and Welfare Rights.Peter Vallentyne - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):237-41.
Who Owns Me: Me Or My Mother? How To Escape Okin's Problem For Nozick's And Narveson's Theory Of Entitlement.Duncan MacIntosh - 2007 - In Malcolm Murray (ed.), Liberty, Games And Contracts: Jan Narveson And The Defense Of Libertarianism. Ashgate.
Once more into the breach of self-ownership: Reply to Narveson and Brenkert. [REVIEW]G. A. Cohen - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (1):57-96.
Response to Narveson on the Refugees Problem.James P. Sterba - 2017 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):89-92.
Ownership of the Person and the Concept of Human Rights.Zhi-Yong Dong - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 6:112-120.
Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?Jan Narveson & James P. Sterba - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Gun Bans, Risk, and Self-Defense.Deane-Peter Baker - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):235-249.
Ownership Rights.Shaylene E. Nancekivell, Charles J. Millar, Pauline C. Summers & Ori Friedman - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 247–256.
Self-ownership and the importance of the human body.Ian Carter - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (2):94-115.
Reply to Narveson, “Reiman on Labor, Value and the Difference Principle”.Jeffrey Reiman - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (3):229-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
50 (#440,222)

6 months
11 (#356,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Allan Gibbard
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references