Proof Systems for Super- Strict Implication

Studia Logica 112 (1):249-294 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper studies proof systems for the logics of super-strict implication ST2–ST5, which correspond to C.I. Lewis’ systems S2–S5 freed of paradoxes of strict implication. First, Hilbert-style axiomatic systems are introduced and shown to be sound and complete by simulating STn in Sn and backsimulating Sn in STn, respectively(for n=2,...,5). Next, G3-style labelled sequent calculi are investigated. It is shown that these calculi have the good structural properties that are distinctive of G3-style calculi, that they are sound and complete, and it is shown that the proof search for G3. ST2 is terminating and therefore the logic is decidable.

Other Versions

original Gherardi, Guido; Orlandelli, Eugenio; Raidl, Eric (2024) "Proof Systems for Super- Strict Implication". Studia Logica 112(1):249-294

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-05

Downloads
339 (#82,729)

6 months
128 (#41,520)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eugenio Orlandelli
University of Bologna
Raidl Eric
University Tübingen

Citations of this work

The Implicative Conditional.Eric Raidl & Gilberto Gomes - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (1):1-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1968 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford,: Blackwell. pp. 98-112.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
The Evidential Conditional.Vincenzo Crupi & Andrea Iacona - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (6):2897-2921.
Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis & C. H. Langford - 1932 - Erkenntnis 4 (1):65-66.
A New Introduction to Modal Logic.G. E. Hughes & M. J. Cresswell - 1996 - Studia Logica 62 (3):439-441.

View all 20 references / Add more references