Unary quantification revisited

Abstract

It is well known that most is not first-order definable, and that the proof is in Barwise and Cooper’s 1981 paper. Actually, Barwise and Cooper present two theorems that bear on the issue. Their theorem C12 says that, for any pair of one-place predicates A and B, there is no sentence of classical predicate logic that is true iff ‘Most A are B’ is. (I assume that ‘Most A are B’ means that more than half of the A’s are B, but the only thing that matters is that most is proportional.) Barwise and Cooper’s C13 states that the foregoing result remains valid when classical logic is enriched with a unary quantifier Q so defined that Qx(Ax) is true iff more than half of the entities in the domain of quantification are A’s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Boolean sentence algebras: Isomorphism constructions.William P. Hanf & Dale Myers - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2):329-338.
An interpolation theorem.Martin Otto - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):447-462.
Bounding quantification in parametric expansions of Presburger arithmetic.John Goodrick - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (5-6):577-591.
Semantics with Only One Bedeutung.Sergey Pavlov - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:81-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
5 (#1,746,116)

6 months
5 (#1,013,651)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bart Geurts
Radboud University Nijmegen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references