Aeschylus, Eumenides 174–8

Classical Quarterly 46 (01):288- (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difficulty in this antistrophe is found mainly in its last line and is caused by κενου which, as it stands, does not make sense and is also unmetrical . It is noticeable on the other hand that the basic meaning of the antistrophe is not really affected by omitting †κενου†, and it looks as though the scholia did not pay any attention to it in commenting as follows:

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Note on Aeschlyus, Agamemnon 403–5 ≈ 420–2.Joseph F. Gannon - 1997 - Classical Quarterly 47 (2):560-564.
Aeschylus, Agamemnon 146 ff.1.Hugh Lloyd-Jones - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):96.
The Meaning of AΠTEPOΣ.E. C. Yorke - 1936 - Classical Quarterly 30 (3-4):151-.
How the dithyramb got its shape.Armand D'angour - 1997 - Classical Quarterly 47 (02):331-.
Aeschylus, Eumenides 945.F. M. Cornford - 1924 - The Classical Review 38 (5-6):113-.
Some Notes on Aeschylus, Eumenides.M. E. Hirst - 1926 - The Classical Review 40 (05):151-.
Aeschylus. Eumenides, 674–680.R. P. Winnington-Ingram - 1935 - The Classical Review 49 (01):7-8.
Aeschylus, Agamemnon 1343–71.R. Winnington-Ingram - 1954 - Classical Quarterly 4 (1-2):23-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
17 (#1,153,842)

6 months
11 (#350,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references