There is no Panentheistic Paradigm

Heythrop Journal 58 (5) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2015

DOI

10.1111/heyj.12314

Other Versions

reprint Göcke, Benedikt Paul (2022) "There is no Panentheistic Paradigm". Heythrop Journal 63(1):49-56

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

True Imaginings Integrating Panentheism and A Personal View of God.Klaus Müller - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1):61-81.
After Physicalism, edited by Benedikt Paul Göcke. [REVIEW]John H. Taylor - 2014 - Mind 123 (490):601-604.
The Attractiveness of Panentheism—a Reply to Benedikt Paul Göcke.Raphael Lataster - 2014 - Sophia 53 (3):389-395.
Review of After Physicalism, ed. Benedikt Göcke. [REVIEW]Robert Bishop - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (2):269-290.
Theists Misrepresenting Panentheism—Another Reply to Benedikt Paul Göcke.Raphael Lataster - 2015 - Sophia 54 (1):93-98.
Benedikt Paul Goecke, ed., After Physicalism. Reviewed by.Matteo Benocci - 2015 - Philosophy in Review 35 (4):198-200.
John Mbiti on the Monotheistic Attribution of African Traditional Religions.Adeolu Oluwaseyi Oyekan - 2021 - Filosofia Theoretica 10 (1):19-34.
Review of Artificial Intelligence: Reflections in Philosophy, Theology and the Social Sciences by Benedikt P. Göcke and Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten. [REVIEW]John-Stewart Gordon - 2021 - AI and Society 36 (2):655-659.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-09

Downloads
33 (#679,146)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

Ancient and contemporary expressions of panentheism.Chad Meister - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (9):e12436.
Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria.R. T. Mullins - 2019 - Journal of World Philosophies 4 (1):204-207.
„Alles ist in Gott“ – Überlegungen zur bestimmenden theologischen Denkform des Corpus Hermeticum.Benedikt Krämer - 2021 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 165 (1):37-57.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references