Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate

Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):33-46 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. A parliamentary debate is a distinct argumentative activity type. In the pragma-dialectical approach, argumentative activity types are defined as conventionalized argumentative practices in which the possibilities for strategic maneuvering are predetermined. What are the characteristics of the activity type of a debate in European Parliament that predetermine the possibilities for strategic maneuvering?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1075/jaic.2.1.02gar

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In Varietate Concordia—United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Bart Garssen - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):10-31.
Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation. [REVIEW]Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):381-392.
Argumentative patterns in discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen - unknown
In Context: Giving Contextualization its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament.Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Karen Tracy - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):253-258.
Problem-Solving Argumentative Patterns in Plenary Debates of the European Parliament.Bart Garssen - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):25-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
27 (#864,536)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Argumentation-based literary translation quality assessment.Mohammad Ali Kharmandar - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):139-156.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references