Against Organizational Functions

Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1093-1103 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, several philosophers have developed a new approach to biological functions, the organizational approach. This is not a single theory but a family of theories based on the idea that a trait token can acquire a function by virtue of the way it contributes to a complex, organized system and thereby to its own continued persistence as a token. I argue that the organizational approach faces a serious liberality objection. I examine three different ways organizational theorists have tried to avoid that objection and show how they fail.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Re-organizing organizational accounts of function.Marc Artiga - 2011 - Applied ontology 6 (2):105-124.
Functions in Ecosystem Ecology.Jay Odenbaugh - 2019 - Philosophical Topics 47 (1):167-180.
Proper Functionalism and the Organizational Theory of Functions.Peter J. Graham - 2023 - In Luis R. G. Oliveira (ed.), Externalism about Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 249-276.
Biological Organization and Cross-Generation Functions.Cristian Saborido, Matteo Mossio & Alvaro Moreno - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):583-606.
A Modal Theory of Function.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (8):412-431.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-15

Downloads
631 (#41,974)

6 months
153 (#28,213)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin Garson
Hunter College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

A Generalized Selected Effects Theory of Function.Justin Garson - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (3):523-543.
What are Functions Good For?Justin Garson - 2022 - Australasian Philosophical Review 6 (4):374-385.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations