Protective Measurements and the Reality of the Wave Function

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (3):777-794 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been debated whether protective measurement implies the reality of the wave function. In this article, I present a new analysis of the relationship between protective measurements and the reality of the wave function. First, I briefly introduce protective measurements and the ontological models framework for them. Second, I give a simple proof of Hardy’s theorem in terms of protective measurements. Third, I analyse two suggested ψ -epistemic models of a protective measurement. It is shown that although these models can explain the appearance of expectation values of observables in a single measurement, their predictions about the variance of the result of a non-ideal protective measurement are different from those of quantum mechanics. Finally, I argue that under an auxiliary finiteness assumption about the dynamics of the ontic state, protective measurement implies the reality of the wave function in the ontological models framework.

Other Versions

manuscript Gao, Shan (2011) "Protective Measurement and the Meaning of the Wave Function".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Uffink's criticism of protective measurements.Shan Gao - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):513-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
82 (#255,485)

6 months
23 (#132,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shan Gao
Shanxi University

Citations of this work

A No-Go Result for QBism.Shan Gao - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (5):1-6.

Add more citations