Some Remarks about Russellian Incomplete Symbols

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1):106-124 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russellian incomplete symbols are usually conceived as an analytical residue—as what remains of the would-be entities when properly analyzed. This article aims to reverse the approach in raising another question: what, if any, does the incomplete symbol contribute to the completely analyzed language? I will first show that, from a technical point of view, there is no difference between the way Russell defines his denoting phrases in “On Denoting” and the way Frege defines his second-order concepts. But I will secondly support that the two notions have two widely different conceptual meanings: the same logical procedures which are used by Frege to increase the deductive power of his system allow Russell to logically relate quantificational notation to ordinary language. Focusing on Russell’s treatment of _OD’s_ puzzles, I will thirdly argue that this shift constitutes the source of a deep transformation in the way logic and language are related.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logical Form in Principia Mathematica and English.Graham Stevens - 2011 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 31 (1).
Russell on Incomplete Symbols.Bryan Pickel - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):909-923.
Incomplete Symbols in Principia Mathematica and Russell’s “Definite Proof”.Ray Perkins - 2011 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 31 (1).
Russell’s proof and meaning in isolation.Michael Rieppel - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
28 (#837,946)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

On concept and object.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Mind 60 (238):168-180.
Analysis and decomposition in Frege and Russell.James Levine - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):195-216.

Add more references