Means of cognition and the shifty split between subjective and objective

In Bhattacharya Roy (ed.), Nalanda Dialogue Series, Volume 4. Navanalanda Mahavihara , Nalanda. pp. 362-378 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As the process of formation of knowledge is a perennial concern of philosophical investigation, any systematic study of philosophy, irrespective of Eastern and Western origins, starts with a thorough assessment of our valid means of cognition. Needless to say, that our means of cognitions play a crucial role in scientific knowledge formation also. But the question of delimiting clearly the objective means of cognition from the subject of cognition continues to stimulate epistemological troubles. This has been dramatized after quantum mechanics. Founding fathers of quantum mechanics as well as the philosophers of science continued to reflect upon the enigmatic dividing line between subjective and objective. It was tried to give a purely logico-empirical objective foundation of the whole spectrum of our knowledge including the scientific. This attempt failed! Here we will give a brief overview of the problem area and the current standpoints - whether we have reached any reasonably better consensus nearly after 2000 years of debate on this.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Subjective Aspects of Scientific Rationality.E. A. Mamchur - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:838-845.
An Introduction to Micro-Epistemology.Tian-en Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:255-261.
Outline of Micro-Epistemology.Tian-en Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:207-213.
What is Probability?Simon Saunders - 2004 - Arxiv Preprint Quant-Ph/0412194.
Kant on Cognition and Knowledge.Markus Kohl - 2024 - In Andrew Stephenson & Anil Gomes (eds.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 27–46.
Contemporary Science and the Marxist-Leninist Theory of Knowledge.P. V. Kopnin - 1971 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 10 (3):218-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-28

Downloads
149 (#153,287)

6 months
37 (#111,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references