The Basic Fault in the Philosophy of Science

Abstract

The basic fault in the philosophy of science is simple enough to put in words and now it is time to do that. This basic fault puts the food on the table for philosophers and scientists, so it is hard to actually get the word out. That is not my problem, though. The basic fault is that we still assume that there is some kind of stuff that ‘everything’ consists of. My aim is to show how we can make it right.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The fault is of the sufferer.A. M. Patel - 2014 - Gujarat, India: Dada Bhagwan Aradhana Trust. Edited by Niruben Amin.
Grices Doppelfehler.Georg Meggle & Maria Ulkan - 1992 - ProtoSociology 2:16-23.
Historical Emissions and the Carbon Budget.Jeremy Moss & Robyn Kath - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (2):268-289.
Two Models of Criminal Fault.R. A. Duff - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (4):643-665.
Reply to Leif Wenar.T. M. Scanlon - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):400-405.
Right-Libertarianism and Luck Sufficientarianism.Konstantin Morozov - 2024 - Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 79:125-133.
On Basic Knowledge and Justification.Bredo C. Johnsen - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):625 - 628.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-27

Downloads
263 (#102,667)

6 months
101 (#59,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Gamper
Subrosa KB

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On a Loophole in Causal Closure.Johan Gamper - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):631-636.

Add more references