Lies, Liberty, and the fall of the Stuarts: James Steuart's Commentary on Hume's History of England

History of European Ideas 46 (4):438-457 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents a commentary by James Steuart on David Hume’s History of the Tudors, written in the early 1760s. In doing so, the article sketches new aspects of Steuart’s political and historical thought at a time when he was hopeful about returning to Scotland from his long continental exile, following his leading role in the 1745 Jacobite rising. After providing a short biographical context, it establishes that the text was written whilst Steuart was working on his Political Oeconomy, and when the ‘Marian controversy’ dominated Scottish historical debate. It goes on to explore the influence of Steuart’s friend Mary Wortley Montagu on his criticism of Hume’s misogynistic representation of Mary, Queen of Scots. It then reconstructs Steuart’s central argument about the failures of monarchs to adapt from feudal to commercial society, resulting in untrammelled liberties that harmed the lower classes. Concerned with the history of industry and commerce, political judgment, and the spirit of the people, Steuart’s hitherto unpublished commentary is a key source for understanding the ‘late Jacobite’ system of thought which influenced the reign of George III and inspired radicals later in the century.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Steuart, James.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2006 - In Virgilio Melchiorre, Paul Gilbert, Michele Lenoci, Antonio Pieretti, Massimo Marassi, Francesco Botturi, Francesco Viola, Elena Bartolini, Sergio Cremaschi, Sergio Givone, Carmelo Vigna, Alfredo Cadorna, Giuseppe Forzani, Mario Piantelli, Alberto Ventura, Mario Gennari, Guido Cimino, Mauro Fornaro, Paolo Volonté, Enrico Berti, Alessandro Ghisalberti, Gregorio Piaia, Claudio Ciancio, Marco Maria Olivetti, Roberto Maiocchi, Maria Vittoria Cerutti & Sergio Galvan, Enciclopedia Filosofica. Milan: Bompiani. pp. 11087-11088.
The Reception of David Hume's Political Thought in Eighteenth-Century America.Mark Gregory Spencer - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Reflections on the Absolute.James A. Ogilvy - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (3):520 - 546.
Notes on Hume’s History (James Steuart, 1760–1765).Cailean Gallagher - 2020 - History of European Ideas 46 (4):458-537.
Hume's Philosophy in Historical Perspective.M. A. Stewart - 2022 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
A treatise of human nature: a critical edition.David Hume - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton.
David Hume: the sceptical conservative.Spartaco Pupo - 2020 - [Italy]: Mimesis International.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-03

Downloads
42 (#581,456)

6 months
5 (#832,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cailean Gallagher
Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Introduction.Dana E. Stewart - 2010 - Mediaevalia 31:1-3.

Add more references