Informed consent doesn't exist in AMI trials

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):190-191 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hilden and Gammelgaard's comments on the evaluation and application of statistical trials and on informed consent lead to the same conclusion that there are special circumstances when clinical trials are performed in emergency situations.The decision to comment on the work that H&G responded to was motivated by the wish to manifest the need to reach a consensus on modifying the conditions in which clinical trials should be performed in special circumstances.One unquestionable fact must first be addressed: clinical trials are necessary for acquiring new knowledge and consequent improvements in health care services. At the same time, patient participation should be encouraged under conditions that respect patients' decision making capability.Are these conditions being met at present? An answer to this is given below

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Informed consent in emergency research: A contradiction in terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
43 (#556,740)

6 months
5 (#777,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fernando Pascual
Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references