Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science

In Sheldon Krimsky & Dominic Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 251-274 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Science in Risk Assessment.S. Funtowicz & J. Ravetz - 1992 - In Sheldon Krimsky & Dominic Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Praeger. pp. 59--88.
Is Community-Based Participatory Research Postnormal Science?David Bidwell - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (6):741-761.
What's Wrong with Quantitative Risk Assessment?Dale Hattis & John A. Smith - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:375 -.
Risk Assessment of Emerging Technologies and Post-Normal Science.Karen Kastenhofer - 2011 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (3):307-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-21

Downloads
21 (#1,004,296)

6 months
21 (#140,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?