- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Making up the past: a response to Sharrock and Leudar
History of the Human Sciences 15 (4):115-123 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
‘Cambridge Change’: a Response to Leudar and Sharrock.Kevin Mcmillan - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):107-110.
Book Review: Response to Steve Fuller. [REVIEW]Graham Richards - 2009 - History of the Human Sciences 22 (5):123-126.
On intellectual critique and the critique of intellectuals: a response to Steve Fuller.Gregor McLennan & Thomas Osborne - 2004 - History of the Human Sciences 17 (4):103-107.
The perpetual ambivalence of intellectuals: a comment on Steve Fuller.Raphael Sassower - 2004 - History of the Human Sciences 17 (4):109-113.
Fuller's Project of Humanity: Social Sciences or Sociobiology.Francis Remedios - 2009 - History of the Human Sciences 22 (2):115-129.
Reviews : Steve Fuller, Science, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, and Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Val Dusek - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):132-138.
Fuller's project of humanity: social sciences or sociobiology?: Steve Fuller, The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage Publications, 2006.Francis Remedios - 2009 - History of the Human Sciences 22 (2):115-120.
A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is no Longer Required for Research Purposes: A Debate Between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller.Colin Barron - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):77-99.
A Fuller Vision of Thomas Kuhn: Response to Roth and Mirowski.Steve Fuller - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):111-117.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
89 (#236,662)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
2013-11-22
Downloads
89 (#236,662)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Critique of Intellectuals in a Time of Pragmatist Captivity.Steve Fuller - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):19-38.
Indeterminacy in the Past: On the Recent Discussion of Chapter 17 of Rewriting the Soul.Ian Hacking - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):117-124.
Within a single lifetime: Recent writings on autism.Gregory Hollin - 2020 - History of the Human Sciences 33 (5):167-178.
Action, Description, Redescription and Concept Change: A Reply to Fuller and Roth.Wes Sharrock & Ivan Leudar - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (2):101-115.
Descriptive vs Revisionary Social Epistemology: The Former as Seen by the Latter.Steve Fuller - 2004 - Episteme 1 (1):23-34.
References found in this work
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.
Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory.Ian Hacking - 1995 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times.Steve Fuller - 2000 - University of Chicago Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-ls7fw uwo