The modern intelligent design hypothesis breaking rules

In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 277 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
47 (#476,870)

6 months
2 (#1,700,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Natural Theology and Religious Belief.Max Baker-Hytch - 2023 - In John Greco, Tyler Dalton McNabb & Jonathan Fuqua (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13-28.
The “who designed the designer?” objection to design arguments.Lloyd Strickland - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):87-100.
The 'why design?' Question.Neil A. Manson - 2008 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik Wielenberg (eds.), New waves in philosophy of religion. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 68.
The Pros and Cons of “Intelligent Design”.Martin Poulsom - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):177-195.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references