Reply to Naef and Mulhall

British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):99-101 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aesthj/ayq050

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

"Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot": Michael Fried. [REVIEW]Nigel Llewellyn - 1983 - British Journal of Aesthetics 23 (2):180.
Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics Current Issue 58 (3):343-343.
Form, elements and modernity: Reply to Michael Podro.Richard Wollheim - 1966 - British Journal of Aesthetics 6 (4):339--345.
“Did This Really Happen?”: Amit Chaudhuri’s Acknowledgement of the Autobiographical.Paul Deb - 2022 - Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics, 44 (4):194-203.
Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary: Stephen Mulhall.G. McFee - 1995 - British Journal of Aesthetics 35:177-177.
Michael Fried and philosophy: modernism, intention, and theatricality.Mathew Abbott (ed.) - 2018 - London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Review. [REVIEW]David Carrier - 1983 - Metaphilosophy 14 (1):72–74.
Review. [REVIEW]David Carrier - 1991 - History and Theory 30:368-381.
Michael Fried and Philosophy: Absorption, Theatricality, and Modernism.Mathew Abbott (ed.) - 2017 - London: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-13

Downloads
60 (#357,630)

6 months
10 (#420,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references