Reflecting and Explicating Biases in Social Research Is not a Self-Serving Enterprise but Should Lead to Reliable Knowledge

Constructivist Foundations 15 (1):43-44 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A Proposal for Personalised and Relational Qualitative Religious Studies Methodology” by Philip Baron.: Philip Baron’s proposals for personalized qualitative research, although not entirely novel, are worth considering. He fails, however, in clarifying their relation to the overall aims of scientific research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Expect the Unexpected.G. de Zeeuw - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):101-102.
Learning Conversations for Cybernetic Enlightenment.B. Scott - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):106-107.
How Change Happens with Difficulty.R. J. Martin - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):109-110.
Radical Constructivism and the Decolonisation of Epistemology.Ben Sweeting - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):326-327.
Non-Dualism and Self-Reference in Constructivism.Edmundo Balsemão Pires - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):209-211.
Personalized Education: What’s the Holdup?L. D. Richards - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):110-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
4 (#1,827,445)

6 months
1 (#1,580,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references