Occidentalism and the Categories of Hegemonic Rule

Theory, Culture and Society 26 (7-8):85-102 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article applies Jack Goody’s critique of Western classifications of historical and ethnographical phenomena to the current discourses of orientalism themselves in an endeavor to understand the sociological basis of what might be called the shift from orientalism to occidentalism. The argument compares the current emergence of anti-civilizational and self-critical discourses to historical examples of similar phenomena and argues that the current shift itself, so well represented in works that may seem similar to Goody’s but which are very more narrowly ideological and lacking in a more general critical stance, are reflexes of the declining hegemony of powerful imperial centers within global systems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
17 (#1,156,101)

6 months
5 (#1,053,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Critical Traditionalism of Ashis Nandy.Alastair Bonnett - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (1):138-157.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Before European Hegemony: The World System, A. D. 1250-1350.Linda Rose & Janet L. Abu-Lughod - 1993 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 113 (1):135.
The East in the West.Jack Goody - 1998 - Science and Society 62 (2):312-314.

Add more references