- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reconciling apparent differences between the responses of humans and other animals to crowding
Psychological Review 86 (1):80-85 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Toward an understanding of the differences in the responses of humans and other animals to density.Reuben M. Baron & Stephen P. Needel - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (3):320-326.
Responses of humans and other animals to variations in density.Jonathan L. Freedman - 1980 - Psychological Review 87 (3):327-328.
Animals.Jeff McMahan - 2003 - In R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 525–536.
Review of Moscati's work Of the corporeal essential differences between the structure of animals and humans (1771).Immanuel Kant - 2007 - Edited by Immanuel Kant.
On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research.Daniel Stokols - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (3):275-277.
There are no known differences in brain mechanisms of consciousness between humans and other mammals.Bernard J. Baars - 2001 - Animal Welfare Supplement 10:31- 40.
An amicus for the defense: Relational reasoning magnifies the behavioral differences between humans and nonhumans.Arthur B. Markman & C. Hunt Stilwell - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):142-142.
Can anthropomorphic analyses of separation cries in other animals inform us about the emotional nature of social loss in humans? Comment on Blumberg and Sokoloff (2001).Jaak Panksepp - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (2):376-388.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
23 (#945,235)
6 months
4 (#1,258,347)
2016-06-30
Downloads
23 (#945,235)
6 months
4 (#1,258,347)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-xlp8h uwo