Property-Owning Democracy and the Difference

Analyse & Kritik 35 (1):9-36 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Rawls says: “The main problem of distributive justice is the choice of a social system.” Property-owning democracy is the social system that Rawls thought best realized the requirements of his principles of justice. This article discusses Rawls’s conception of property-owning democracy and how it is related to his difference principle. I explain why Rawls thought that welfare-state capitalism could not fulfill his principles: it is mainly because of the connection he perceived between capitalism and utilitarianism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free (and Fair) Markets without Capitalism.Martin O'neill - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 75–100.
Introduction.Martin O'neill & Thad Williamson - 2012-02-17 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property‐Owning Democracy. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
79 (#265,091)

6 months
21 (#140,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Freeman
University of Pennsylvania

References found in this work

Contractualism and utilitarianism.Thomas M. Scanlon - 1982 - In Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 103--128.
Work, Ownership, and Productive Enfranchisement.Nien‐hê Hsieh - 2012 - In Martin O'Neill & Thad Williamson (eds.), Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 147--162.

Add more references