Nonmonotonic inference operations

Logic Journal of the IGPL 1 (1):23-68 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A. Tarski [21] proposed the study of infinitary consequence operations as the central topic of mathematical logic. He considered monotonicity to be a property of all such operations. In this paper, we weaken the monotonicity requirement and consider more general operations, inference operations. These operations describe the nonmonotonic logics both humans and machines seem to be using when infering dofeasible information from incomplete knowledge. We single out a number of interesting families of inference operations. This study of infinitary inference operations is inspired by the results of [11] on finitary nonmonotonic operations, but this paper is self-contained

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
21 (#1,009,308)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Defaults as restrictions on classical Hilbert-style proofs.Gianni Amati, Luigia Carlucci Aiello & Fiora Pirri - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (4):303-326.
Generalized compactness of nonmonotonic inference operations.Heinrich Herre - 1995 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5 (1):121-135.
Characterizations of Preferential Entailments.Yves Moinard & Raymond Rolland - 2002 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 10 (3):245-272.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Results on infinite extensions.Karl Schlechta - 1991 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 1 (1):65-72.

Add more references