Frédéric Le Play and 19th-century vision machines

History of the Human Sciences 30 (1):66-93 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An early proponent of the social sciences, Frédéric Le Play, was the occupant of senior positions within the French state in the mid- to late 19th century. He was writing at a time when science was ascending. There was for him no doubt that scientific observation, correctly applied, would allow him unmediated access to the truth. It is significant that Le Play was the organizer of a number of universal expositions because these expositions were used as vehicles to demonstrate the ascendant position of western civilization. The fabrication of linear time is a history of progress requiring a vision of history analogous to the view offered the spectator at a diorama. Le Play employed the design principles and spirit of the diorama in his formulations for the social sciences, and L’Exposition Universelle of 1867 used the technology wherever it could. Both the gaze of the spectators and the objects viewed are part and products of the same particular and unique historical formation. Ideas of perception cannot be separated out from the conditions that make them possible. Vision and its effects are inseparable from the observing subject who is both a product of a particular historical moment and the site of certain practices.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The tribunal of philosophy and its norms: history and philosophy in Georges Canguilhem’s historical epistemology.Cristina Chimisso - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):297-327.
Reforming vision : the engineer Le Play learns to observe society sagely.Theodore M. Porter - 2011 - In Lorraine Daston & Elizabeth Lunbeck (eds.), Histories of scientific observation. London: University of Chicago Press.
History and Play: Johan Huizinga and His Critics.Robert Anchor - 1978 - History and Theory 17 (1):63-93.
Joseph Conrad and the Epistemology of Impressionism.John Gerard Peters - 1996 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
From Social Sciences to Philosophy and Back Again.Aleksei Zygmont - 2018 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 6:151-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-04

Downloads
21 (#1,003,416)

6 months
4 (#1,246,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The world as will and representation.Arthur Schopenhauer & E. F. J. Payne - 1958 - New York,: Dover Publications. Edited by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman & Christopher Janaway.
Eye and Mind.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1964 - In The Primacy of Perception. [Evanston, Ill.]: Northwestern University Press. pp. 159-190.

View all 21 references / Add more references