- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can Interpretations Ever Be Acceptable Basic Premises?
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises. [REVIEW]David Hitchcock - 2007 - Philosophical Inquiry 29 (1-2):168-175.
Review of James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. [REVIEW]Hans V. Hansen - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10).
James B. Freeman,dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. A theory of argument structure.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):319-321.
Commentary on James B. Freeman: “The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Bias”.Andrei Moldovan - unknown
Review: Charles B. Daniels, James B. Freeman, Gerald W. Charlwood, Toward an Ontology of Number, Mind and Sign. [REVIEW]Linda Wetzel - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1102-1104.
Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem.James B. Freeman - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
“Dialectics and the macrostructure of argument” by James Freeman.Alec Fisher - 1992 - Informal Logic 14 (2):193-204.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
23 (#942,055)
6 months
6 (#862,561)
2015-04-02
Downloads
23 (#942,055)
6 months
6 (#862,561)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-xq25r uwo