The International Criminal Court's Provisional Authority to Coerce

Ethics and International Affairs 26 (1):93-101 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The United Nations ad hoc tribunals in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda had primacy over national judicial agents for crimes committed in these countries during the most notorious civil wars and genocide of the 1990s. The UN Charter granted the Security Council the right to establish a tribunal for Yugoslavia in the context of ongoing civil war and against the will of recalcitrant national agents. The Council used that same right to punish individuals responsible for a genocide that it failed earlier to prevent in Rwanda. In both cases the Council delegated a portion of its coercive title to independent tribunal agents, thereby overriding the default locus of punishment in the world order: sovereign states.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-international Armed Conflict as War Crime within the Jurisdiction of ICC.Xiu-mei Wang - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:133-140.
Constructing Achievement in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia : A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis.Amanda Potts & Anne Lise Kjær - 2016 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (3):525-555.
The Abolition of the Death Penalty in Rwanda.Audrey Boctor - 2009 - Human Rights Review 10 (1):99-118.
A Different Level, a Different Purpose? Reflections on International Criminal Law from the Perspective of Penal Theory.Jean-Luc Baechler - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 51-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
26 (#858,544)

6 months
7 (#728,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against international criminal tribunals: reconciling the global justice norm with local agency.Peter J. Verovšek - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (6):703-724.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant's Sovereignty Dilemma: A Contemporary Analysis.Katrin Flikschuh - 2010 - Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (4):469-493.
Index.Arthur Ripstein - 2009 - In Force and freedom: Kant's legal and political philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 389-399.
Uganda's Civil War and the Politics of ICC Intervention.Adam Branch - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (2):179-198.

View all 6 references / Add more references