- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The duality of mind: an historical perspective
In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press (2009)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The duality of mind: a historical perspective.Keith Frankish & Evans & B. T. Jonathan St - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Keith Frankish, eds., In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Reviewed by.Konrad Talmont-Kaminski - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (5):331-333.
An architecture for dual reasoning.Peter Carruthers - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Dual-process models: A social psychological perspective.Eliot R. Smith & Elizabeth C. Collins - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 197--216.
The two systems of learning: an architectural perspective.Ron Sun, Sean M. Lane & Mathews & C. Robert - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective.Valerie A. Thompson - 2009 - In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Is it time for a tri-process theory? Distinguishing the reflective and algorithmic mind.K. E. Stanovich - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 55--88.
In two minds about rationality?Clare Saunders & Over & David - 2009 - In Jonathan St B. T. Evans & Keith Frankish (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
17 (#1,148,884)
6 months
17 (#172,227)
2014-01-28
Downloads
17 (#1,148,884)
6 months
17 (#172,227)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
What we can (and can’t) infer about implicit bias from debiasing experiments.Nick Byrd - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-29.
Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing.Keith E. Stanovich & Maggie E. Toplak - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):3-13.
Addiction: choice or compulsion?Edmund Henden, Hans Olav Melberg & Ole Rogeberg - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychiatry 4 (77):11.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo