Abstract

Developing my long-held contention that an artist might write art-theory differently from non-artist theorists, this paper offers an instantiation of one possible approach. First and foremost, it proposes that an artist's art-theory might utilise their understanding of aesthetic form and functioning to conceive of writing as another ‘art-form’, now taking place in words and referencing the structures associated with that medium. With a nod to Plato’s dialogues, the text adopts the format of a fictional conversation offered as reportage, which takes place between the artist-writer and a philosopher - an expert on the subject of ‘truth-regimes’. The artist consults him in order to progress a project. What ensues puts the artist-writer's preference for a ‘realist’ approach to writing into play with the academic's overview of this and other 'truth regimes'. Introduced to Richard Rorty’s pragmatism and hence the idea of ‘truth’ as ‘use-value’, the artist is initially bewildered, only later realising that it takes her project in a new direction. Given that the text’s departure from the form of conventional art-theory is embodied, the issues that it raises are implicit, but include: the advantages of fictional-dialogue as 'theory'. Another point for debate concerns the recourse to the Renaissance pedagogic concept of 'teaching through delight'. As much as this text is an instance of ‘a writing-as-an-art-form as theory’, it also proposes, reciprocally, that 'theory' may be found outside non-fictional, non-aesthetic academic discourse. When this is the oblique logic of the writing's form, it is also explicitly elaborated in the article, as Dürer’s woodcut The Draughtsman and the Lute is seen to comprise observations about the conditions of representation that re-appear in the ‘picture’ that is the fictional discussion in the Café Flaubert