- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defending the Defense
Mind 108 (431):563-566 (1999)
Abstract
My hunch has always been that in the end, Fregeanism will defeat Millianism. So I suspect that my (1998) arguments on behalf of Millianism are flawed. Peter Graham (1999) is confident he has found the flaws, but he has not. I hope that some clarification will encourage others to reveal the errors.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Epistemology of No Platforming: Defending the Defense of Stupid Ideas on University Campuses.Michael Veber - 2021 - Journal of Controversial Ideas 1 (1):1-13.
The Ethics of No Platforming: Defending the Defense of Immoral Ideas on University Campuses.Michael Veber - 2024 - Journal of Controversial Ideas 4 (2):12.
Unanswerable questions for everyone: reply to Inan.Philip Atkins & Tim Lewis - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (2):263-271.
Contradictory Belief and Epistemic Closure Principles.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind and Language 14 (2):203–226.
Eliciting and Conveying Information.Heimir Geirsson - 2020 - In Heimir Geirsson & Stephen Biggs (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York: Routledge. pp. 153-166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
514 (#54,582)
6 months
58 (#95,282)
2009-01-28
Downloads
514 (#54,582)
6 months
58 (#95,282)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54ff658c48-5nmb9 uwo