Developing a federal policy on research misconduct

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since April 1996, the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), in collaboration with the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in the Executive Office of the President, has been leading the development of a government-wide Federal policy for research misconduct. The author is a Senior Policy Analyst in the Office of Science and Technology Policy and a participant in this process. This paper places the NSTC/OSTP effort in historical context, outlines the process by which the policy will be finalized, and discusses the principal issues raised during the policy development process.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-999-0017-6

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on 'developing a federal policy on research misconduct' (s. francis).Kenneth J. Ryan - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):273-274.
Conference Theme Lecture: STS or PRD (Policy, Research, and Democracy)?Daryl E. Chubin - 1998 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 18 (3):147-152.
Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach by Barbara K. Redman.Melissa S. Anderson - 2015 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (3):5-9.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Politics and Science: A Series of Lessons.Neal Lane - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (3):861-874.
Research misconduct policy in biomedicine: beyond the bad-apple approach.Barbara Klug Redman - 2013 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Status of retraction notices for biomedical publications associated with research misconduct.Daniel Drimer-Batca, Jonathan M. Iaccarino & Alan Fine - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (2):1-5.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
The Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Issue: Implications for Science Policy.Elsa Elizabeth Macias - 1995 - Dissertation, Arizona State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#493,054)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Commentary: Legacy of the Commission on Research Integrity.Barbara K. Redman - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):555-563.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
Accountability and responsibility in research.Patricia K. Woolf - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):595 - 600.
Allocating Credit and Blame in Science.Daryl E. Chubin - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (1-2):53-63.

Add more references