Defending the young: Female aggression, resources, dominance, and the emptiness of patriarchy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):224-225 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Points of criticism of the target include: the extreme violence of females in defence of young despite high potential cost, the reality of female dominance striving, differences in male and female ritualization of aggression, the real existence of institutionalized female instrumental aggression, and the uselessness of “patriarchy” as defined as a category for differential analysis. It is concluded that it may in fact be the decline of patriarchy in the strict sense that leads to the female use of exculpatory explanations for aggression, thus reversing Campbell's proposed causal sequence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theories of male and female aggression.Kirsti M. J. Lagerspetz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):229-230.
Primacy of organising effects of testosterone.Anne Campbell, Steven Muncer & Josie Odber - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):365-365.
Risk-taking, fear, dominance, and testosterone.John Archer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):214-215.
Aggression in female mammals: Is it really rare?Paul F. Brain - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):218-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#334,020)

6 months
11 (#362,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references