You ought to read this — fact

The Philosophers' Magazine 36:85-85 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1354814X

DOI

10.5840/tpm20063625

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peter Winch. [REVIEW]Graeme Kirkpatrick - 2000 - The Philosophers' Magazine 11 (11):59-59.
Saint Peter? [REVIEW]Wayne Yuen - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 62 (62):122-123.
Well read. [REVIEW]Alison Ainley - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 33 (33):89-89.
Peter Singer.Edward Johnson - 2005 - The Philosophers' Magazine 32 (32):78-79.
The Puzzle of Peter.Peter Vardy - 2000 - The Philosophers' Magazine 10 (10):51-53.
J’accuse Peter Singer.David Oderberg - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine 13 (13):48-49.
You say you want a revolution? [REVIEW]Matthew Pianalto - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):103-104.
Peter pulls no punches.Simon Eassom - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 25:57-57.
Bewildered? You will be..Peter Simons - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 39 (39):65-68.
When are you dead?Ken Kipnis - 2004 - The Philosophers' Magazine 27 (27):41-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
44 (#508,899)

6 months
13 (#266,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter S. Fosl
Transylvania University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references