Reply to Armstrong

Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

reprint Foster, John (2004) "Reply To Armstrong". The Harvard Review of Philosophy 12(1):27-28

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Armstrong on dispositions.James Franklin - 1988 - Philosophical Quarterly 38 (150):86-87.
Perception without belief.George S. Pappas - 1977 - Ratio (Misc.) 19 (December):142-161.
Armstrong and perception.C. G. Prado - 1968 - Theoria 34 (3):256-258.
In defence of the cognitivist theory of perception.David M. Armstrong - 2004 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):19-26.
A note on the belief theory of perception.Norman Melchert - 1973 - Philosophical Studies 24 (November):427-429.
Appearing as irreducible in perception.Alan H. Goldman - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (December):147-164.
The propositional structure of perception.Joseph Runzo - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (3):211-220.
Max Deutscher and perception.David M. Armstrong - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):246-249.
An examination of D m Armstrong's theory of perception.John O. Nelson - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):154-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#327,127)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy, Drama and Literature.Rick Benitez - 2010 - In Graham Robert Oppy, Nick Trakakis, Lynda Burns, Steven Gardner & Fiona Leigh (eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia & New Zealand. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing. pp. 371-372.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references