Just the facts, and only the facts, about human rationality?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):254-255 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) laudable program to keep the scientific investigation of human reasoning norm-free and focused on the facts alone is an essential part of a long tradition in the philosophy of science – but it faces deeper difficulties than the authors seem to realize, since reasoning is a competence, and the very concept of competence is normative

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Undisputed norms and normal errors in human thinking.Vittorio Girotto - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):255-256.
Reason is normative, and should be studied accordingly.David Spurrett - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):267-268.
The “is-ought fallacy” fallacy.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):262-263.
Epistemic normativity from the reasoner's viewpoint.Joëlle Proust - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):265-265.
Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
Rational belief.Henry E. Kyburg - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (2):231-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
30 (#747,543)

6 months
7 (#698,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references