Pantheism vs. Theism: A Re-appraisal

The Monist 80 (2):286 - 306 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If pantheism is by definition the belief in impersonal deity, then there is little point in exploring any inter-connection with personalistic theism. Theism would exclude pantheism, and pantheism theism. To be sure, there are strong reasons why pantheism has insisted upon divine impersonality, and these need to be explored and assessed. That is our task in the first part of the paper, while the second part will introduce a way of considering the correlation of pantheism and theism in a new light. It will presuppose a different way of understanding the temporal modalities, but for the time being, in this first part, we shall make the ordinary assumption that only the present is fully real. The past is no longer, and the future is not yet.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pantheism and Science.Peter Forrest - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):307-319.
Pantheism.Michael Levine - 1997 - In Charles Taliaferro & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 337–347.
Theism and pantheism.Franz Hoffman & D. J. Snider - 1871 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 5 (1):86 - 94.
American Naturalism on Pantheism 1.Martin O. Yalcin - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):156 - 179.
Theism or Pantheism? [REVIEW]Robin Collins - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):567-573.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
135 (#163,777)

6 months
31 (#116,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references